The clinical diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is important to direct an accurate course of therapy. Previous studies have reported a correlation between the signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratios of the anti-HCV screening test and confirm HCV infections for American anti-HCV screening kits as well as for those in China. It is currently unknown whether clinical laboratories use the same threshold S/CO ratios under routine conditions and if these values are acceptable for the analysis of Chinese samples. A total of 336 anti-HCV screening-test-positive serum samples were tested in duplicate using different lots of three most commonly used enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits available in China. Samples were also tested using the Architect Anti-HCV chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) kit and measured for HCV RNA. Recombinant immunoblot assays (RIBA) were additionally performed on samples with HCV RNA-negative results with RIBA HCV 3.0. The relationship between S/CO ratios and confirmed HCV infection rates were analyzed. The threshold S/CO ratio for each screening kit correlated with the >= 95% positive predictive value was InTec 12.0, KHB 4.0, Wantai 5.0, and Abbott Architect 5.0. Therefore, the same threshold S/CO ratios for manufactured domestically EIA kits was difficult to attain. A multi-center study with a large sample size is required to identify a uniform threshold S/CO ratio for use in different diagnostic laboratories. Alternatively, individual laboratories may be required to establish threshold S/CO ratios in their own laboratories to obtain consistent diagnostic results. J. Med. Virol. 83:1930-1937, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.