高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FINDINGS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATIC EPITHELIOID ANGIOMYOLIPOMA COMPARED WITH HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ EI

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Med Ultrasound, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma Hepatocellular carcinoma Imaging Diagnosis

摘要:
Hepatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) has malignant potential that can easily be misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the treatment options of these conditions are different. This retrospective study investigated whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can differentiate EAML from HCC. We included 24 patients with pathologically confirmed EAML and 36 patients with HCC who underwent pre-operative conventional ultrasound and CEUS. The conventional ultrasound and CEUS features of the two groups were analyzed. Time intensity curves (TICs) were analyzed for all lesions using quantitative perfusion analysis software. This study found that significant differences existed between the EAML and HCC groups in terms of clinical features such as sex, age, symptoms, alpha-fetoprotein and history of hepatitis B virus infection (p < 0.05). Tumor size, number, border and echogenicity on conventional ultrasound were significantly different between EAML and HCC (p < 0.05). Regarding CEUS, EAML was more likely to have a centripetal enhancement pattern than HCC (p < 0.05). The tumor enhancement degree in the delayed phase in CEUS was significantly different between EAML and HCC (p < 0.05). Quantitative analysis of CEUS parameters revealed that the wash-in area under the curve (AUC) was larger in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). Time to peak was significantly shorter in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). The peak intensity was significantly stronger in EAML than in HCC (p < 0.05). Regarding the diagnostic performance of CEUS parameters that showed statistical significance on univariate analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing EAML from HCC was 66.7%-100.0% and 55.6%-91.7%, respectively. Overall, CEUS could be valuable in differentiating EAML from HCC. Specific features such as the centripetal filling and prolonged enhancement patterns on CEUS, higher peak intensity, bigger wash-in AUC and shorter time to peak on TICs may contribute to a more confirmative differential diagnosis of EAML. (E-mail: Liky20006@126.com) (C) 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 声学 3 区 核医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 声学 3 区 核医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Q2 ACOUSTICS
最新[2023]版:
Q2 ACOUSTICS Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Med Ultrasound, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:426 今日访问量:0 总访问量:408 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)