高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The major factor of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: Amyloid overload or microcirculation impairment?

| 导出 | |

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China [2]First Affiliated Hosp Xiamen Univ, Dept MRI, Xiamen, Peoples R China [3]Siemens Healthineers Ltd, MR Collaborat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: cardiac amyloidosis magnetic resonance imaging left ventricular systolic dysfunction amyloid overload microcirculation impairment

摘要:
PurposeAmyloid overload and microcirculation impairment are both detrimental to left ventricular (LV) systolic function, while it is not clear which factor dominates LV functional remodeling in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the major factor of LV systolic dysfunction using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and methodsForty CA patients and 20 healthy controls were included in this study. The CA group was divided into two subgroups by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): patients with reduced LVEF (LVEF < 50%, rLVEF), and patients with preserved LVEF (LVEF >= 50%, pLVEF). The scanning sequences included cine, native and post-contrast T1 mapping, rest first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement. Perfusion and mapping parameters were compared among the three groups. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between LVEF and mapping parameters, as well as the relationship between LVEF and perfusion parameters. ResultsRemarkably higher native T1 value was observed in the rLVEF patients than the pLVEF patients (1442.2 +/- 85.8 ms vs. 1407.0 +/- 93.9 ms, adjusted p = 0.001). The pLVEF patients showed significantly lower slope dividing baseline signal intensity (slope%BL; rLVEF vs. pLVEF, 55.1 +/- 31.0 vs. 46.2 +/- 22.3, adjusted p = 0.001) and a lower maximal signal intensity subtracting baseline signal intensity (MaxSI-BL; rLVEF vs. pLVEF, 43.5 +/- 23.9 vs. 37.0 +/- 18.6, adjusted p = 0.003) compared to the rLVEF patients. CA patients required more time to reach the maximal signal intensity than the controls did (all adjusted p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between LVEF and first-pass perfusion parameters, while significant negative correlation was observed between LVEF and native T1 (r = -0.434, p = 0.005) in CA patients. ConclusionAmyloid overload in the myocardial interstitium may be the major factor of LV systolic dysfunction in CA patients, other than microcirculation impairment.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2021版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2020版] 出版后一年[2022版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:589 今日访问量:0 总访问量:441 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)