单位:[1]Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China[2]Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China[3]Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Peoples R China[4]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Pharm, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China药学部华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院[5]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Pharm, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院[6]Pengzhou Second Peoples Hosp, Pengzhou, Peoples R China
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of gefitinib plus chemotherapy (GCP) versus gefitinib alone for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in China. Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was conducted to simulate the disease process of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Three distinct health states: progressionfree survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) and death were included. Clinical data were derived from the NEJ009 study. The cost was evaluated from the perspective of the Chinese society. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated over a 10-year lifetime horizon. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to explore the uncertainty of parameters in the study. Results: The base case analysis demonstrated that gefitinib plus chemotherapy gained 2.44 QALYs at an average cost of $59,571.34, while the effectiveness and cost of gefitinib group were 1.82 QALYs and $52,492.75, respectively. The ICER for gefitinib plus chemotherapy was $11,499.98 per QALY gained. The ICER was lower than the accepted willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, which was three times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of China ($31,498.70 per QALY). Variation of parameters did not reverse the cost-effectiveness of gefitinib plus chemotherapy through univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Our results showed that gefitinib plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective treatment option compared with gefitinib for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations in China.
基金:
National Key R&D Program of China, China [2017YFC0909900]
第一作者单位:[1]Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China[2]Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China[3]Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Peoples R China[4]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Pharm, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China[2]Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Evidence Based Pharm Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China[3]Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Shu Yamin,Zhang Qilin,He Xucheng,et al.Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy versus Gefitinib Alone for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations in China[J].CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH.2021,13:8297-8306.doi:10.2147/CMAR.S334643.
APA:
Shu, Yamin,Zhang, Qilin,He, Xucheng&Chen, Li.(2021).Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy versus Gefitinib Alone for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations in China.CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH,13,
MLA:
Shu, Yamin,et al."Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy versus Gefitinib Alone for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations in China".CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH 13.(2021):8297-8306