Objectives: To compare the anti-biofilm efficacy of two antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), 1018 and DJK-5, in disrupting canal wall biofilms in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules of single-rooted maxillary premolars. Methods: Enterococcus faecalis single-species biofilms were formed in-situ in the root canal system of the premolars (n = 91). Confocal laser scanning microscopy, bacterial sampling, colony-forming unit counting, XTT assay, lactate dehydrogenase assay and phenol-sulphuric acid method were used to identify the anti-biofilm efficacy of both AMPs and their influence on bacterial metabolic activity. Results: Both AMPs disrupted in-situ E. faecalis biofilms and altered their metabolic activity. At 20 mu g/mL, the D-enantiomeric AMP DJK-5 killed 55.5 %, 57.3 % and 55.8 % of biofilm bacteria in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules, respectively, in 1 min. In contrast, the c-enantiomeric AMP 1018 only eradicated 25.6 %, 25.5 % and 27.5 % of biofilm bacteria in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules, respectively, within the same time. Anti-biofilm efficacy of the root canal irrigants tested were in the order: 6 % NaOCl > 20 mu g/mL DJK-5 > 10 mu g/mL DJK-5 > 20 mu g/mL 1018 > 10 mu g/mL 1018 > 0.9 % NaCl. Conclusions: The present results are confirmatory of previous studies, in that D-enantiomeric AMPs exhibit more potent antibacterial properties than L-enantiomeric AMPs against E. faecalis biofilms within the canal space. Nevertheless, the potency of both AMPs are concentration-dependent. Incorporation of these agents into EDTA, a non-antibacterial calcium-chelating irrigant for removal of the inorganic component of the canal space debris, does not reduce the efficacy of either AMP. Clinical Significance: The present study provides the proof of concept that incorporation of an antimicrobial peptide into a calcium-chelating root canal irrigant enhances the disinfection of intratubular single-species biofilms during smear layer and smear plug removal.