GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation
单位:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med Coll,Tongji Hosp,Reprod Med Ctr,Wuhan,Hubei,Peoples R China妇产科学系计划生育专科华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院[2]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med Coll,Tongji Hosp,Dept Urol,Wuhan,Hubei,Peoples R China外科学系华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院泌尿外科
Objective: This study aims to explore the differences of the ovarian stimulation (OS) characteristics, laboratory, and clinical outcomes between follicular-phase single-dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Methods: About 1883 consecutive IVF/ICSI fresh cycles of normal ovarian responders were retrospectively analyzed, with 1229 in the single-dose GnRH agonist protocol group and 654 in the GnRH antagonist protocol group at Reproductive Medical Center of Tongji Hospital from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017. Results: The follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist group showed significantly more oocytes obtained, higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate, as well as lower luteinizing hormone (LH) level and estradiol (E2)/oocyte ratio on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. However, differences were not significant in meiosis II (MII) oocyte rate, two pronuclear zygote (2PN) embryo rate, viable embryo rate or high-quality embryo rate, compared with the GnRH antagonist group. Further comparison of clinical outcomes in the first frozen-thawed cycles did not show significant difference in either implantation or clinical pregnancy rate between the two protocol groups. Conclusions: Follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol may achieve better clinical outcomes in normal ovarian responders, which could be explained more by positive effect on endometrial receptivity rather than embryo quality.
基金:
National Natural Science Foundation of China [81401268]
第一作者单位:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med Coll,Tongji Hosp,Reprod Med Ctr,Wuhan,Hubei,Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med Coll,Tongji Hosp,Reprod Med Ctr,Wuhan,Hubei,Peoples R China[*1]Affiliated Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med,Tongji Hosp,Reprod Med Ctr,Wuhan,Hubei,Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Geng Yudi,Xun Yang,Hu Shiqiao,et al.GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation[J].GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY.2019,35(4):309-313.doi:10.1080/09513590.2018.1528221.
APA:
Geng, Yudi,Xun, Yang,Hu, Shiqiao,Lai, Qiaohong&Jin, Lei.(2019).GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation.GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY,35,(4)
MLA:
Geng, Yudi,et al."GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phase single-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation".GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY 35..4(2019):309-313