Are blastocysts derived from in-vitro-matured metaphase I (MI) oocytes less likely to produce usable embryos for transfer compared with those derived from in-vivo-matured oocytes in cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)?The primary outcome was usable blastocyst rate, which was compared between blastocysts derived from in-vitro-matured MI oocytes after ovarian stimulation and from in-vivo-matured oocytes. Logistic regression analysis using generalized estimating equations was used to control for confounders in the analysis of factors that may influence the chance of a blastocyst being usable and in the comparison of embryological outcomes. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare clinical and pregnancy outcomes.A total of 1810 injected metaphase II (MII) oocytes from 154 PGT cycles involving 154 couples were included in this study. A total of 1577 MII oocytes were in-vivo-matured and 233 were in-vitro-matured MI oocytes. The usable blastocyst rate was similar between the in-vitro-matured MI oocyte group and the in-vivo-matured oocyte group (adjusted RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.34). Three live births were achieved using usable blastocysts derived from in-vitro-matured MI oocytes.If in-vitro-matured MI oocytes can be fertilized and develop into blastocysts, their ability to provide usable embryos for transfer is similar compared with those developed from in-vivo-matured oocytes. These blastocysts could be considered valuable for women with few viable embryos in assisted reproductive technology cycles.Copyright © 2023 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.