高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD)

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Nursing Ctr, Sch Nursing, 28 Yanxi Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China [2]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Nursing,Wuhan,Peoples R China [3]Northumbria Univ, Midwifery & Hlth, Dept Nursing, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England [4]Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China [5]Univ Connecticut, Sch Nursing, Storrs, CT USA
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Normalization process theory NPT Implementation Psychometric properties Pressure injury Nurse

摘要:
Background The Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) is a brief quantitative tool based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT), which can measure the implementation process of new technologies and complex interventions. The aim of our study was to translate and culturally adapt the NoMAD into Chinese, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of NoMAD. Methods According to the NoMAD translation guideline, we undertook forward translation, backward translation, and compared these translations to get a satisfactory result, then we performed cognitive interviews to achieve cross-culture adaptation. And the psychometric properties of the final version were evaluated among clinical nurses who used the pressure injuries management system via WeChat mini-program at a tertiary hospital in northwestern China. Results A total of 258 nurses were enrolled in our study, and the response rate was 92.1%. The Cronbach's alpha of four dimensions were as follow: Coherence (0.768), Cognitive Participation (0.904), Collective Action (0.820), and Reflexive Monitoring (0.808). The overall internal consistency was 0.941. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed a good fit for its theoretical structure (CFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.910, RMSEA = 0.0079, SRMSR = 0.046, chi(2)/df = 2.61). The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.857 to 1, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.95. There were positive correlations between four constructs scores and three general normalization scores. Conclusions The Chinese version of NoMAD is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the implementation process of innovations.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 卫生保健与服务
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 卫生保健与服务
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
最新[2023]版:
Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Nursing Ctr, Sch Nursing, 28 Yanxi Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China [2]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Nursing,Wuhan,Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Nursing Ctr, Sch Nursing, 28 Yanxi Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China [4]Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Nursing, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:432 今日访问量:0 总访问量:412 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)