高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Evaluation of the prognostic nutritional index for the prognosis of Chinese patients with high/extremely high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ 预警期刊

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Urol,Wuhan 430030,Hubei,Peoples R China [2]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Urol,1095 Jiefang Ave,Wuhan 430030,Hubei,Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: High/extremely high-risk Prostate cancer Prognostic nutrition index Prognostic evaluation Radical prostatectomy

摘要:
BACKGROUND The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is on the rise in China. The risk level of patients with PCa is associated with disease-free survival rate at 10 years after radical prostatectomy. Predicting prognosis in advance according to the degree of risk can provide a reference for patients, especially treatment options and postoperative adjuvant treatment measures for high-risk/extremely high-risk patients. AIM To explore the predictive value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for biological recurrence in Chinese patients with high/extremely high-risk PCa after radical prostatectomy. METHODS The biochemical test results and clinical data of 193 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for the first time from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. The PNI value of peripheral blood within 1 wk before surgery was calculated, and during the follow-up period, prostate-specific antigen >= 0.2 ng/mL was considered to have biological recurrence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal critical value and area under the curve (AUC) of the patients. According to the critical value, the progression-free survival of the high PNI group and low PNI group was compared. The independent influencing factors of the patients' prognosis were obtained by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS The non-biological recurrence rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.02%, 84.05%, and 74.85%, respectively. The optimal critical value for PNI to predict biological recurrence was 46.23, and the AUC was 0.789 (95% confidence interval: 0.651-0.860; P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity were 82.93% and 62.30%, respectively. In accordance with the optimal critical value of the ROC curve (46.23), 193 patients were further divided into a high PNI group (PNI <= 46.23, n = 108) and low PNI group (PNI > 46.23, n = 85). The incidence of postoperative complications in the high PNI group was lower than that in the low PNI group (21.18% vs 38.96%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the overall survival rate at 5 years in the low PNI group was 87.96% (13/108), which was lower than that in the high PNI group (61.18%, 33/85; P < 0.05). Low PNI [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.74; P = 0.003] and positive incisal margin status (HR = 2.14; P = 0.001) were independent predictors of biological recurrence in patients with high/extremely high-risk PCa. CONCLUSION The PNI has predictive value for the prognosis of patients with high/extremely high-risk PCa, and is an independent prognostic factor. Patients with low PNI value have a shorter time of non-biological recurrence after prostatectomy. It is expected that the combined prediction of other clinicopathological data will further improve the accuracy and guide postoperative adjuvant therapy to improve the quality of prognosis.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Urol,Wuhan 430030,Hubei,Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Urol,Wuhan 430030,Hubei,Peoples R China [2]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Urol,1095 Jiefang Ave,Wuhan 430030,Hubei,Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update [2]Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models [3]Prognostic significance of six clinicopathological features for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis [4]Evaluation of NOTCH family genes' expression and prognostic value in prostate cancer [5]Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]Prediction of Pathological Upgrading at Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Texture Features and Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps [7]Bi-exponential versus mono-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating prostate cancer aggressiveness after radical prostatectomy: a whole-tumor histogram analysis [8]Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group=2 prostate cancer [9]Androgen receptor splice variant 7 detected by immunohistochemical is an independent poor prognostic marker in men receiving adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy [10]Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy

资源点击量:589 今日访问量:0 总访问量:441 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)