高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of Conventional and Platelet-Rich Plasma-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA [2]Harvard Med Sch, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA [3]Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong, Peoples R China [4]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Traumat Surg, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Fat grafting Plate-rich plasma Fat survival rate Patient satisfaction Recovery time Meta-analysis

摘要:
Background: Autologous fat grafting (FG) is a popular technique for soft-tissue augmentation, but the fat survival rate is unpredictable. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as an adjuvant to enhance fat graft survival. Objectives: This literature review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of PRP on the survival rate of fat grafting. Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search was done to identify clinical studies on PRP and fat cotransplantation in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases up to May 2020. The reference lists of selected articles were reviewed to identify any additional related articles. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare PRP + FG and conventional FG in terms of fat graft survival rate, patient satisfaction rate, and recovery time after surgery. Results: Eleven studies consisting of 1125 patients were analyzed. Patients were followed up from 3 to 24 months post-FG. The fat survival rate varied from 20.5% to 54.8% in FG alone and from 24.1% to 89.2% in the PRP + FG groups. The survival rate was significantly higher and recovery time was significantly lower in the PRP + FG group than in the FG alone group. However, there was no significant difference in the patient satisfaction rate between the groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that PRP-enhanced fat transplantation has better efficacy than conventional fat grafting. Further studies are required to provide the optimum concentration of PRP and the long-term efficacy of the technique. There is not enough evidence to compare the rate of complications with PRP and fat cotransplantation and conventional fat grafting. (C) 2021 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 SURGERY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA [2]Harvard Med Sch, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA [3]Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA [2]Harvard Med Sch, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:432 今日访问量:0 总访问量:412 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)