Background: There is limited literature on conventional US to assess bone age. Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of US in the assessment of abnormal bone age in Chinese children. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, children and young adults aged between birth and 19 years from a large provincial teaching hospital were enrolled from January to November 2020. Children without clinical diseases potentially affecting skeletal growth were included in the normal-value group. Children with clinically suspected growth disturbances who were undergoing bone age evaluation were included in the validation group. Ossification ratios (ie, the ratio of the height of the epiphyseal ossification center to the entire epiphysis, including the cartilaginous component) of the radius, ulna, and femur from all the children were measured using US. Ultrasonic skeletal maturity scores (ie, the summation of ossification ratios of the radius, ulna, and femur multiplied by 100) collected from children in the normal-value group were used for score-for-age curve fitting through Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Test performance characteristics for the ability of US to help diagnose abnormal bone age were determined using radiographic bone age as a reference standard. Statistically significant difference between groups was determined by using a paired-sample t test. Results: A total of 1089 children (median age, 9 years [interquartile range, 3-14 years]; 578 boys) were enrolled, including 929 children (mean age, 8 years [interquartile range, 4-12 years]; 515 boys) in the normal-value group and 160 children (mean age, 9 years [interquartile range, 7-11 years]; 63 boys) in the validation group. Ultrasonic bone ages in the validation group were evaluated with use of the lists of normal score-for-age values. With radiographic bone age as a reference standard, US could help diagnose abnormal bone age with high sensitivity (93% [14 of 15 participants; 95% CI: 66, 100] for boys, 100% [14 of 14 participants; 95% CI: 73, 100] for girls) and specificity (98% [47 of 48 participants; 95% CI: 88, 100] for boys, 98% [81 of 83 participants; 95% CI: 91, 100] for girls). Conclusion: The US scoring system established can be used to evaluate bone age with high sensitivity and specificity. (C) RSNA, 2021