Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Study of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Severe/Moderately Severe Hemophilia A
单位:[1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[2]Tongji Med Coll Huazhong, Union Hosp, Wuhan, Peoples R China华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院[3]Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Coll Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China浙江大学医学院附属第一医院[4]Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China[5]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China[6]Capital Univ Med Sci, Beijing Childrens Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院[7]Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Suzhou, Peoples R China[8]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Blood Dis Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China[9]Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China[10]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院[11]Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Cangzhou, Peoples R China[12]Shire BioSci Shanghai Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China[13]Baxalta Innovat GmbH, Vienna, Austria
Antihemophilic factor (recombinant) (rAHF; ADVATE(R); Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA) is indicated for the treatment and prevention of bleeding in patients with hemophilia A. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with rAHF in previously treated Chinese patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A. This open-label, sequential, interventional, postapproval study (NCT02170402) conducted in China included patients of any age with hemophilia A with factor VIII (FVIII) level <= 2%. Patients received 6 months' on-demand rAHF then 6 months' rAHF prophylaxis (20-40 IU/kg every 48 +/- 6 hours). The primary objective was percentage reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the per-protocol analysis set (PPAS); secondary objectives included ABR by bleeding subtype, hemostatic efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety. Of 72 patients who received >= 1 rAHF dose, 61 were included in the PPAS. Total ABR was lower during prophylaxis (mean 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-3.7; median 0) versus on-demand treatment (mean 58.3, 95% CI 52.5-64.7; median 53.9), representing a 95.9% risk reduction. Similar findings in favor of prophylaxis were observed for all types of bleeding event by cause and location. rAHF hemostatic efficacy was rated as "excellent"/"good" in 96.1% of treated bleeding events. Transient FVIII inhibitors (0.6-1.7 BU) in 4 patients resolved before study end; no unexpected safety issues were observed. rAHF prophylaxis in this study of previously treated Chinese patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A resulted in a clear reduction in bleeding events versus rAHF on-demand treatment, with no change in safety profile.
基金:
Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA; Baxalta Innovations GmbH, a Takeda company, Vienna, Austria
第一作者单位:[1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[*1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Hematol, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[*1]Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Hematol, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zhao Yongqiang,Hu Yu,Jin Jie,et al.Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Study of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Severe/Moderately Severe Hemophilia A[J].CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS.2021,27:doi:10.1177/1076029621989811.
APA:
Zhao, Yongqiang,Hu, Yu,Jin, Jie,Zhao, Xielan,Wang, Xuefeng...&Engl, Werner.(2021).Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Study of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Severe/Moderately Severe Hemophilia A.CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS,27,
MLA:
Zhao, Yongqiang,et al."Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Study of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Severe/Moderately Severe Hemophilia A".CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS 27.(2021)