高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med Coll,Affiliated Tongji Hosp,Dept Biliary Pancreat Surg,Wuhan,Peoples R China [2]Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA [3]Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA [4]Univ Oklahoma, Dept Surg, Oklahoma City, OK USA [5]GEM Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Surg Gastroenterol & Hepatopancreatobiliary, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India [6]Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Clin Surg, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland [7]Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland [8]Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China [9]Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA [10]Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China [11]Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Pancreat Surg, Hangzhou, Peoples R China [12]Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pancreat Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China [13]Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Pancreat Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China [14]Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea [15]Asan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg, Seoul, South Korea [16]Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan [17]Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, NUTRIM Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab, Dept Surg, Maastricht, Netherlands [18]All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Disciplines, New Delhi, India [19]Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary & Transplant Surg, Singapore, Singapore [20]Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China [21]Hosp Conde S Januario, Dept Gen Surg, Macau, Peoples R China [22]Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan [23]Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan [24]Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Pancreat & Gastr Surg, Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China [25]Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Macau, Peoples R China [26]Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Hangzhou, Peoples R China [27]Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Consensus pancreaticoduodenectomy laparoscopy Delphi technique

摘要:
Importance: While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is being adopted with increasing enthusiasm worldwide, it is still challenging for both technical and anatomical reasons. Currently, there is no consensus on the technical standards for LPD. Objective: The aim of this consensus statement is to guide the continued safe progression and adoption of LPD. Evidence Review: An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statements were produced upon reviewing the literature and assessed by the members of the expert panel. The literature search and its critical appraisal were limited to articles published in English during the period from 1994 to 2019. The Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials databases were searched, The search strategy included, but was not limited to, the terms 'laparoscopic', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy, 'pancreatoduodenectomy', 'Whipple's operation', and 'minimally invasive surgery'. Reference lists from the included articles were manually checked for any additional studies, which were included when appropriate. Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument was applied to assess the methodological quality and externally validate the final statements. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting at the 1st Summit on Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery in Wuhan, China. Findings: Twenty-eight international experts from 8 countries constructed the expert panel. Sixteen statements were produced by the members of the expert panel. At least 80% of responders agreed with the majority (80%) of statements. Other than three randomized controlled trials published to date, most evidences were based on level 3 or 4 studies according to the AGREE II-GRS Instrument. Conclusions and Relevance: The Wuhan international expert consensus meeting on LPD has produced a set of clinical practice statements for the safe development and progression of LPD. LPD is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. More robust randomized controlled trial and registry study are essential to proceed with the assessment of LPD.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 营养学 2 区 外科 3 区 胃肠肝病学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 胃肠肝病学 1 区 营养学 1 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q1 SURGERY Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Q1 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Med Coll,Affiliated Tongji Hosp,Dept Biliary Pancreat Surg,Wuhan,Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:589 今日访问量:0 总访问量:441 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)