A self-designed questionnaire was given to 634 health professionals in a large teaching hospital in Hubei Province in mainland China, to clarify the participants' attitude towards information disclosure to cancer patients. Statistic description was used to analyze the data. The item 'inappropriate information about cancer easily leads to medical disputes' scored highest at 3.86, while the scores of such items as 'advantages of fully informing patients outweigh disadvantages', 'if their family members demand nondisclosure, you will find it difficult to cooperate in good faith with patients', and 'telling white lies to patients disturbs you a lot' were less than 3. The health care staff placed a high value on both the desire and priority of patients to know the truth, though most of them did not think that patients had received enough information about their disease. In order to improve cancer patients' current state of knowledge, health professionals should learn more about informed consent, and special methods and guidelines compatible with Chinese culture are urgently required in China.
基金:
Key Technologies R&D Program of Hubei Province in China [2005AA301C34]
第一作者单位:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China[*1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Sch Med & Hlth Management, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zeng Tieying,Huang Haishan,Zhao Meizhen,et al.Health professionals' attitude towards information disclosure to cancer patients in China[J].NURSING ETHICS.2011,18(3):356-363.doi:10.1177/0969733011398096.
APA:
Zeng Tieying,Huang Haishan,Zhao Meizhen,Li Yan&Fang Pengqian.(2011).Health professionals' attitude towards information disclosure to cancer patients in China.NURSING ETHICS,18,(3)
MLA:
Zeng Tieying,et al."Health professionals' attitude towards information disclosure to cancer patients in China".NURSING ETHICS 18..3(2011):356-363