高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Neonatal outcomes after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an analysis of a 5-year period

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Reprod Med Ctr, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Early rescue ICSI neonatal outcome congenital birth defects IVF total fertilization failure

摘要:
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Teaching hospital. Patient(s): There were 13,232 ovarian stimulation cycles (IVF, n = 9,631; ICSI, n = 2,871; early rescue ICSI, n = 730) that resulted in the delivery of 5,001 babies (IVF, n = 3,670; ICSI, n = 1,095; early rescue ICSI, n = 246) from August 2008 to August 2013. Intervention(s): Early rescue ICSI. Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rates, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects were analyzed. Result(s): The early rescue ICSI cycles did not seem to have a negative effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (43.42%) when IVF cycles (45.33%) were compared with ICSI cycles (44.39%). In the early rescue ICSI group, a total of 254 clinical pregnancies were achieved: 197 (33.67%) live births, 38 (6.49%) miscarriages, 2 (0.79%) induced abortions, 3 (1.18%) fetal deaths, and 4 pregnancies (1.57%) without completion at follow-up. Overall, the multiple gestations, the delivery method, mean gestational age, preterm deliveries, mean birth weight, and rate of congenital birth defects of the early rescue ICSI group were similar to those in the conventional IVF and ICSI groups. Conclusion(s): Early rescue ICSI had similar clinical pregnancy rates when compared with conventional IVF and ICSI, in addition to the delivery of healthy children. The clinical evidence from the early rescue ICSI group did not show an elevated rate of malformations. Early rescue ICSI seems to be a safe alternative method for individuals with total fertilization failure or near total fertilization failure when compared with conventional IVF treatment. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2014]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 妇产科学 2 区 生殖生物学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 妇产科学 1 区 生殖生物学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2013]版:
Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2013版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2012版] 出版后一年[2014版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Reprod Med Ctr, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Reprod Med Ctr, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China [*1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Reprod Med Ctr, 1095 JieFang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:426 今日访问量:0 总访问量:410 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)