There are still some controversies on the association between dietary folate intake and the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers including esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers. Hence, a comprehensive meta-analysis on all available literatures was performed to clarify the relationship between dietary folate intake and risks of upper gastrointestinal cancers. An electric search was performed up to December 12th, 2016 within the PubMed, MEDLINE AND EMBASE databases. Ultimately, a total of 46 studies which evaluated the association between folate intake and risks of upper gastrointestinal cancers were included. According to the data from included studies, the pooled results showed significant association between folate intake and esophageal (OR = 0.545, 95% CI = 0.432-0.658), gastric (OR= 0.762, 95% CI = 0.6480.876) and pancreatic (OR= 0.731, 95% CI = 0.555-0.907) cancers. Linearity doseresponse analysis indicated that with 100 mu g/day increment in dietary folate intake, the risk of esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers would decrease by 9%, 1.5% and 6%, respectively. These findings indicated that higher level of dietary folate intake could help for preventing upper gastrointestinal cancers including esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers.
基金:
Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2011CDB520]
第一作者单位:[1]Wuhan Univ, Dept Pathol, Renmin Hosp, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Liu Wen,Zhou Heng,Zhu Yaoqi,et al.Associations between dietary folate intake and risks of esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis[J].ONCOTARGET.2017,8(49):86828-86842.doi:10.18632/oncotarget.18775.
APA:
Liu, Wen,Zhou, Heng,Zhu, Yaoqi&Tie, Chaorong.(2017).Associations between dietary folate intake and risks of esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis.ONCOTARGET,8,(49)
MLA:
Liu, Wen,et al."Associations between dietary folate intake and risks of esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis".ONCOTARGET 8..49(2017):86828-86842