Background Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) are noninvasive techniques for the diagnosis of skin lesions. Their accuracy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) has not been systematically studied. Objectives We aimed to investigate systematically the accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM and to compare the accuracy between them for diagnosing AHM. Methods We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies about dermoscopy, RCM and AHM from inception to 31 June 2019. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. The pooled results were calculated using a random effects model in Stata 14, Meta-DiSc, RevMan 5 center dot 3 and SAS 9 center dot 4. We also explored the sources of heterogeneity by sensitivity analysis. Results Seven studies with a total of 1111 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of AHM were 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0 center dot 37-0 center dot 81] and 90% (95% CI 0 center dot 74-0 center dot 97), respectively. The corresponding respective values of RCM for the diagnosis of AHM were 67% (95% CI 0 center dot 51-0 center dot 81) and 89% (95% CI 0 center dot 86-0 center dot 92). In three studies including the performance of both RCM and dermoscopy, the relative diagnostic odds ratio of RCM over dermoscopy was 4 center dot 69 (95% CI 0 center dot 81-27 center dot 3) (P = 0 center dot 068). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that both dermoscopy and RCM offer good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and moderate sensitivity in the diagnosis of AHM. RCM is more accurate than dermoscopy in diagnosing AHM but the comparison needs to be confirmed. What's already known about this topic? Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) is the most lethal skin cancer. The diagnosis of AHM is a great challenge because of its nonspecific clinical manifestation. Early diagnosis can improve the prognosis. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have high diagnostic accuracy for pigmented melanoma. What does this study add? Both dermoscopy and RCM offer good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and moderate sensitivity for AHM. RCM might be more accurate than dermoscopy for diagnosis of AHM. More research on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM for AHM is required in support of these findings.
基金:
National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772913]
第一作者单位:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Lan J.,Wen J.,Cao S.,et al.The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY.2020,183(2):210-219.doi:10.1111/bjd.18722.
APA:
Lan, J.,Wen, J.,Cao, S.,Yin, T.,Jiang, B....&Tao, J..(2020).The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY,183,(2)
MLA:
Lan, J.,et al."The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis".BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY 183..2(2020):210-219