高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China [2]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China [3]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Affiliated Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Biliary Pancreat Surg,Wuhan,Hubei,Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Background Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) are noninvasive techniques for the diagnosis of skin lesions. Their accuracy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) has not been systematically studied. Objectives We aimed to investigate systematically the accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM and to compare the accuracy between them for diagnosing AHM. Methods We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies about dermoscopy, RCM and AHM from inception to 31 June 2019. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. The pooled results were calculated using a random effects model in Stata 14, Meta-DiSc, RevMan 5 center dot 3 and SAS 9 center dot 4. We also explored the sources of heterogeneity by sensitivity analysis. Results Seven studies with a total of 1111 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of AHM were 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0 center dot 37-0 center dot 81] and 90% (95% CI 0 center dot 74-0 center dot 97), respectively. The corresponding respective values of RCM for the diagnosis of AHM were 67% (95% CI 0 center dot 51-0 center dot 81) and 89% (95% CI 0 center dot 86-0 center dot 92). In three studies including the performance of both RCM and dermoscopy, the relative diagnostic odds ratio of RCM over dermoscopy was 4 center dot 69 (95% CI 0 center dot 81-27 center dot 3) (P = 0 center dot 068). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that both dermoscopy and RCM offer good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and moderate sensitivity in the diagnosis of AHM. RCM is more accurate than dermoscopy in diagnosing AHM but the comparison needs to be confirmed. What's already known about this topic? Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) is the most lethal skin cancer. The diagnosis of AHM is a great challenge because of its nonspecific clinical manifestation. Early diagnosis can improve the prognosis. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have high diagnostic accuracy for pigmented melanoma. What does this study add? Both dermoscopy and RCM offer good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and moderate sensitivity for AHM. RCM might be more accurate than dermoscopy for diagnosis of AHM. More research on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM for AHM is required in support of these findings.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 皮肤病学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 皮肤病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q1 DERMATOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 DERMATOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:428 今日访问量:0 总访问量:412 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)