高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Quantitative comparison of calcium hydroxide removal by endoactivator, ultrasonic and protaper file agitation techniques: An in vitro study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China [2]Univ Mosul, Conservat Dept, Coll Dent, Mosul, Iraq
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: calcium hydroxide removal irrigation ProTaper EndoActivator ultrasonic

摘要:
Calcium hydroxide (CH) dressing residues can compromise endodontic sealing. This study aimed to evaluate the amount of remaining CH in root canals after mechanical removal by four groups of irrigation techniques including needle irrigation only, ProTaper file, EndoActivator, and ultrasonic file. Fifteen extracted single-rooted teeth were collected and used for all four groups. The samples were firstly prepared by ProTaper rotary instruments, and then sectioned longitudinally through the long axis of the root canals, followed by final reassembling by wires. CH was kept in the canals for 7 days setting. The removal procedure began with 5 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) followed by 1 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and a final irrigation with 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl solution for all groups. No additional agitation of the irrigant was performed in group 1, while agitation for 20 s between irrigants was done with F2 ProTaper rotary file in group 2, EndoActivator with tip size 25/.04 in group 3 and by an ultrasonic file 25/.02 in group 4. The total activation time was 60 s. The roots were then disassembled and captured by digital camera. The ratio of CH coated surface area to the surface area of the whole canal as well as each third of the canal was calculated. The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA using post hoc Tukey test. Results showed that none of the four techniques could remove all CH. No significant difference was found between EndoActivator and ultrasonic techniques. However, they both removed significantly more CH than ProTaper and needle irrigation (P=0.0001). In conclusion, the sonic and ultrasonic agitation techniques were more effective in removing intracanal medicaments than the ProTaper rotary file and needle irrigation in all thirds of the canal.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2012]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 生化与分子生物学
最新[2025]版:
JCR分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
最新[2023]版:

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2011版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2010版] 出版后一年[2012版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China [2]Univ Mosul, Conservat Dept, Coll Dent, Mosul, Iraq
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:428 今日访问量:0 总访问量:412 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)