高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effectiveness analysis of three-drug combination therapies for refractory focal epilepsy

| 导出 | |

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Drug-resistant epilepsy Rational polytherapy Antiseizure medications Triple therapy Effectiveness

摘要:
Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n ​= ​95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n ​= ​48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P ​< ​0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P ​< ​0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR ​= ​0.67; adjusted P ​= ​0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 临床神经病学 2 区 神经科学 2 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 药学 2 区 临床神经病学 2 区 神经科学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:432 今日访问量:1 总访问量:414 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)