单位:[1]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China[2]Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China[3]Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China[4]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol,Tongji Hosp,Tongji Med Coll,Dept Nursing,Wuhan 430030,Peoples R China华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院护理部[5]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Neurol, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China[6]SunYat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Guangzhou 510000, Peoples R China[7]Ningxia Med Univ Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Yinchuan 750000, Peoples R China[8]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Nursing Ctr, Sch Nursing, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China[9]Gansu Gem Flower Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
BackgroundManaging hypertension in frail older patients is challenging. Several institutions and organizations have published up-to-date hypertension guidelines suggesting frailty screening among older hypertensive patients, with new recommendations for blood pressure-lowering treatment among the frail population. However, the quality of current hypertension guidelines and the consistency of antihypertension treatment recommendations for frail older patients and their supporting evidence remain unknown.ObjectiveIn this review, we aimed to systematically collect guidelines with antihypertension treatment recommendations for frail older patients, examine and compare these recommendations, and critically assess reporting and methodology quality of these guidelines.MethodsA literature search was conducted on two databases and three major websites of guideline development organizations. The AGREE instrument and RIGHT checklist were used to evaluate the methodology and reporting quality of the guidelines, respectively. The consistency of recommendations within the guidelines were compared using descriptive analysis.ResultsWe identified 13 hypertension guidelines. The overall methodology quality scores (range 23.35-79.07%) and reporting rates (range 10/35-29/35) varied among these guidelines. Four guidelines provided an explicit definition of frailty. Considering treatment tolerability or increased likelihood of adverse effects while using pharmacotherapy in frail older patients was mentioned in all guidelines. Ten guidelines recommended adjusting blood pressure targets or specific pharmacotherapy programs. Four guidelines recommended using clinical judgment when prescribing. However, the specific recommendations lacked clarity and unity without sufficient evidence.ConclusionsThere were considerable variations in methodology and reporting quality across the 13 included hypertension guidelines. Furthermore, the depth and breadth of antihypertension treatment recommendations for frail older patients were varied and inconsistent. Further trials exploring optimal treatment are urgently required to promote the development of specific guidelines for managing frail older hypertensive patients.
第一作者单位:[1]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Hu Kaiyan,Zhou Gang,Jiang Mengyao,et al.Hypertension Treatment in Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Guidelines[J].DRUGS & AGING.2023,40(10):881-893.doi:10.1007/s40266-023-01053-1.
APA:
Hu, Kaiyan,Zhou, Gang,Jiang, Mengyao,Wei, Xiaohong,Yu, Jing...&Ma, Bin.(2023).Hypertension Treatment in Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Guidelines.DRUGS & AGING,40,(10)
MLA:
Hu, Kaiyan,et al."Hypertension Treatment in Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Guidelines".DRUGS & AGING 40..10(2023):881-893